Diabetes Gene Discovery that Brings Hopes to Patients

73

By SaiKit

When they can't cure it, they blame the genes

How convenient is it! To blame the genes (God) when they can't find out the real cause and cure to a disorder and disease.

Based on real researches, I am convinced that positive or negative genes traits are only symptoms, just like the diseases that they are supposed to cause are only symptoms. The real causes of diseases are environment, diet, relationship, and stress.

see: http://drhyman.com/the-failure-of-decoding-the-human-genome-and-the-future-of-medicine-3361/

These things can impact our genes within the period of a few months. They can turn on or off the positive or negative genes. These genetic information will also pass on to our next generation, and thus creating children with similar genetics.

The truth is that foods are information. They can override our genes. Also, our gut flora is very important too, because the bacteria that live inside our guts contains at least a 100 times more DNA than we do. If we have bad bacteria, it can cause all kinds of allergies, disorders, dieases, and even mental illnesses such as depressions.

Ultimately everything that goes wrong indicates something that goes wrong in our lifestyle. In other words, it means mineral or vitamin deficiency, because poor lifestyle always create deficiency of some important minerals or vitamins.

"You can trace every sickness, every disease and every ailment to a mineral deficiency."

Dr. Linus Pauling, two-time Nobel Prize winner

So it is with diabetes. Type 1 diabetes is connected to vaccination. Usually parents would notice that the symptoms began shortly after a child is vaccinated. The content within vaccine would create autoimmune response, which makes the immune system to destroy the body. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease.

Parents, I strongly objects to any kind of vaccinations. Amish people don't take any vaccination, and their children are more healthy than other children in the same country they live in. They don't have autism either, and of the few that do, they were vaccinated due to coercions by the medical experts.

Vaccinations have been found to be an important part of the de-population schemes. Today, vaccinations can sterilize and lobotomize people. It can also inject nanochip into the body and track the person 24/7, and that chip can create disease as super weapon could be used to target the person in combination with the chips. All in all, vaccination is capable of doing a lot of bad stuff to people, and questionable for any good.

Lifestyle that Reverse Diabetes

Dr. Hyman find that genes for diabetes can be turned to positive if the patients eat the right foods.

see: http://drhyman.com/the-overwhelming-evidence-of-the-healing-power-of-food-3324/

The fact that foods are the ultimate medicine is not widely preached by the medical industry is because it is not profitable to do so. Foods are natural, so they can't be patented.

The reason why I trust Dr. Hyman is because he doesn't follow the money. His website sells supplements and some of his books, but he opposes the more expensive treatment and drugs. In his blog, he talks about the many different diseases and illnesses that he helped to reverse simply using dietary supplements and recommended lifestyle changes for the patients.

This is big. As a doctor, you don't speak against the big pharma, or you risk losing everything. People get jailed for actually curing any disease, because the word "cure" is illegal! As doctor, you can manage the diseases in patients, but you can never promise to "cure" the patients. You may use the words "treatment", "control", "reverse", "manage", but not "cure".

Chemical drugs can never and have never cured any disease, but they only make the problems worst in the long run by creating new symptoms (side effect), and they are expensive. Big pharma like Universal health care, because their profit is guaranteed by the tax payer money. Don't support the medical-industrial-complex! Governments sleeping with industries on the same bed is always bad for the people.

Doctors like Dr. Hyman are very few. It takes a lot of courages and resourcefulness to go against the medical industry like he does, but two things I disagree with him are his stances on antibotics and vaccinations. He still believes in vaccinations (not a strong proponent, but does mention it as a good thing in his blog). I prefer colloidal silver than antibotics.

Comments

Chasuk profile image

Chasuk Level 5 Commenter 12 months ago

Interesting article. I'll have to read more about the epigenome.

Your English is excellent, SaiKit. I teach English as second language, so I know how difficult mastering a second language can be. If you don't mind me asking, what is your first language, and how long have you been speaking English?

SaiKit profile image

SaiKit Hub Author 12 months ago

Thanks Casuk,

You are the second atheist who commend me for my English! Your compliment made me very happy. Ya it took me a long time---12 years to get where I am in terms of English writing, but oral wise, I still speak in broken English with heavy accent, because I have no one to practice with.

I do read a lot and watch Youtube to improve my English though.

Although I have spent 12 years on English, the real improvment probably took place in the last 4 years when I started blogging about God and other things.

We have very good ESL classes in the high school I went to (Canada), so that probably set a good foundation for me.

My first language is Cantonese. I understand Mandarin but couldn't really speak well with it.

Chasuk profile image

Chasuk Level 5 Commenter 12 months ago

My brother's wife speaks Taishanese and Cantonese as her first languages. I don't think she left Guangdong province for the United States until she was 30, but she speaks pretty good English now. Still, her written expression is better than her verbal expression.

SaiKit profile image

SaiKit Hub Author 12 months ago

Some of my biggest opponents in religious debates are also my biggest encouragements. Who would have thought that? One person who accused me of heresy said I was very clever in doing that (spreading heresy), and that really helped me to know that I am clever!

It pays off to say something controversial.

Chasuk profile image

Chasuk Level 5 Commenter 12 months ago

The first hub of yours that I read was "Does God Exist? Proof of God From A Christian!" I like it more than any of your subsequent hubs. You seem like a nice guy, and you are intelligent, but the subjects of your hubs have drifted more and more towards the fringe. Have your interests changed?

SaiKit profile image

SaiKit Hub Author 12 months ago

You mean my recent hubs? Does the fringe hub include this one as well?

Some of the hubs are commercial though, does that include those as well? The most recent hubs, including this one, are actually journal entries for recent researches that I think would be too valuable to just pass by, so I decide to make hubs with them.

BTW, the more closer you get to the truth, the more it makes you re-think the world. It makes you think that maybe the reality we live in is only part of the social engineering project that the elites are creating for more profit and power. And if you follow the money, and the organization such as Council on Foreign Relation, you will find out that it is the case.

Chasuk profile image

Chasuk Level 5 Commenter 12 months ago

You make the claim in this hub that, 'People get jailed for actually curing any disease, because the word "cure" is illegal!' You also indicate your skepticism of antibotics and vaccinations. Those are fringe beliefs, yes. Many of your recent hubs seem focused on fringe beliefs. I don't read commercially oriented hubs, so I can't comment on those.

SaiKit profile image

SaiKit Hub Author 12 months ago

ya, I didnt make a real effort to support those fringe beliefs, because that would take another hub to explain per each, and recently I have been using hubs as journal, which actually increased the entertainment values, and the writing speed, because I was able to loose myself more when I saw it only as journal entry, with some freedom to use "hearsay" without bothering to really prove it air-tightedly.

Chasuk profile image

Chasuk Level 5 Commenter 12 months ago

When you decide not to make any effort to substantiate fringe beliefs, your hubs become of interest only to those who already share those beliefs.

SaiKit profile image

SaiKit Hub Author 12 months ago

Or they could use the links I provide to investigate further. The could also Google "vaccination bad", or "Amish autism" to find out for themselves and see if it's true or not.

Chasuk profile image

Chasuk Level 5 Commenter 12 months ago

Most anti-vaccination skeptics have already read the anti-vaccination evidence and found it unconvincing.

Have you read my hub, What a Skeptic Wants?

SaiKit profile image

SaiKit Hub Author 12 months ago

I did. Most of the times what the skeptics really need to learn is to observe the general causes and effects. It works quicker to find out answer to almost anything. This is only the first step. The second step is to dig deeper once you identifies something that seems to lead to the truth, and you verify it along the way.

The way mainstream media, texbooks, mainstream scientists, and mordern medicine find evidence, cure, or anything does very little good. Just see the medical industry and you will see what I mean.

The more I see the more I find out that the way to find truth is to observe case by case and make the best educational guess at first, and then follow the trails.

It is also important to understand human nature, for example, professional and experts are humans too and most of them do follow the money. Study and math can be misinterpreted in favor of some interest group. Diabolical people do exist who want to social engineer the world toward certain belief...etc

If you combine these elements, you can find out a lot of truth.

Another example is to study the Rockefeller families, and the money they "donate" to causes, seminaries, medical schools, and other things. Also study the quotes they have made throughout the years, and other ancedotal witnesses who claimed they said such and such things, and you will understand the world in a deeper way I believe.

Why? Because Rockefellers have shaped the world so much with their wealth. If you understand the shaper of history, it helps you find out the truth people like them don't want you to know, but sometime they are very open about it. (e.g. depopulation, eliminating competition, New World Order) Rockefellers also promoted vaccinations (they changed the entire medical industry in the 20-30s through donations).

SaiKit profile image

SaiKit Hub Author 12 months ago

More examples of how you may gather evidence is to look at the news that mainstream media refused to broadcast, but was slipped through the quack by whistleblowers, and you verify if the content is valid.

The key is not to judge whether a piece of ancedotal evidence is 100% true or false right away (because it is impossible, nothing can be 100% proven to be true or false), but to keep gathering all sort of evidence until you come up with the big pictures.

You keep going until there is sufficient likelihood to accept or reject a belief.

For example, if you buy a lottery ticket, and a machine can scan your ticket and respond with a beep that tells you whether it hits the jackpot. If it is a hit, it beeps 100% of the times, but if it is not a hit it still beeps 25% of the times.

One machine cannot tell you whether a ticket hits the jackpot or not. But what if you have 10 machines that beeps to your ticket?

See what I mean?

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working